Saturday, December 24, 2022

Musing on Panzerblitz's Turn Sequence & Actions

 As promised, more analysis of the Panzerblitz game is here bringing the tenets of the older linear sequence of play a bit more into the 21st century while still trying to keep the (linear) spirit of the original alive and not make things too random or crazy.  Read on!  


The Original Turn Sequence

Panzerblitz's original turn sequence was novel for its day.  Bringing the "sharp end" of the battle into focus for the wargamer, you were now making the decisions for the battalion commander, staff officers, or the company commander.  Decisions on support-by-fire positions and flanking maneuvers all come into focus for the player, guided by a turn sequence that required the support-by-fire unit to remain stationary and forbade the flanking units from firing.  It certainly makes life a bit easier so we'll keep that aspect intact from the original.  Speaking of the original sequence, here it is in its glory:

  • Mine Attacks
  • German Player Direct Fire Attacks
  • German Player Moves and conducts Armored Overrun 
  • German Player conducts Infantry Close Assault Attacks
  • Switch German/Russian Player
  • Turn Complete

This sequence is very straightforward and I'm not going to stray too far from it.  While the 2011 (?) published version "Hill of Death" features a much more asymmetric turn sequence where players pull "Ops" chits from a container with "0" "1" or "2" on them.  These are hex radius that can be activated, thus initiating an almost "mini" turn within the overall turn sequence.  Units can do "stuff" are still limited to moving and assaulting or shooting for the most part.  Again, since MMP is doing it, I'm going to do it.

Dan Fraser's "Panzerblitz in Miniature" Turn Sequence

Dan pretty much perfected the turn sequence from Panzerblitz by accounting for things that weren't in the original and combining them.  While his wikipage (canuckcommander) is still available I couldn't find the rules to download on it anymore.  Here is his turn sequence from his Panzerblitz in Miniature rules:

  • Recovery Phase
  • Indirect Fire Phase
  • Direct Fire Phase
  • Air Phase
  • Move Phase
  • Switch Players

My Proposal - The Operations-Based Turn Sequence

I really liked the idea of pulling Ops chits but I dont like the randomness of it, preferring the ability to set up an attack and carry it through.  That being said, there should be some "fog of war" and you as the commander, should have to prioritize the tough decisions.  That's what they're paying you for!  Who do you reinforce?  Who gets the main effort for fires?  Where is the reserve element going to be placed?  I wanted all of those decisions to come into the game but in a way that forces a bit of uncertainty onto the player. 

Instead of "Ops Chits" I am going to try to introduce "Operations Points" or "OPs".  You as the commander roll 2D6 and that will tell you how many units you can activate, or what staff actions your battle staff will carry out.  In this way, your focus is task-oriented and prioritized towards the objectives of the mission.  Things that take more of the staff's time and coordination will cost more.  Units can do "stuff" at lower cost to represent unit initiative where they are at.  So with all that said, here is my proposed turn sequence and OP cost:

  • Both Players Roll 2D6 for OPs (Simultaneous)
  • Adjust OP Tracker 
  • Roll Initiative for the Turn
  • Player A Ops Phase
  •     Stationary Fires (Free) /Place Units on Overwatch (1 OP) OW units may fire in the enemy turn
  •     Movement (1 OP) & Overrun Attacks (2 OP) /Close Assaults (1 OP)
  •     Player B Indirect Fire Lands (2 OP) from Last Turn
  • Player B Ops Phase
  •     Stationary Fires (Free) /Place Units on Overwatch (1 OP) OW units may fire in the enemy turn
  •     Movement (1 OP) & Overrun Attacks (2 OP) /Close Assaults (1 OP)
  •     Player B Indirect Fire Lands (2 OP) from Last Turn
  • Recovery Phase (Joint Rally Attempts - Simultaneous)
  • Adjust Time / Clear Unused OPs

So a few things on this need some explaining.  I'm clearly a fan of the stationary fires but am putting "overwatch" into the mix (think Fistful of TOWS or the "First Battle" turn sequence.  You sacrifice your own movement to shoot during the enemy Movement phase.  This costs you a single OP just as if you moved).  Also I'm instituting a delay for indirect fire.  This takes some time, even for Direct Support guns and that is factored into when the IDF lands vrs when it is called for (the phase prior - yes your IDF lands during your Opponent's turn, right after he moves - this should reward players for using their artillery to break up enemy attacks).

Summarized OP Cost

Most of these actions, save for direct fire attacks, cost OPs.  Here is a proposed, summarized list of OP cost for various actions:

  • Direct Fire attack (Free)
  • Movement (1 OP)
  • Place a unit on Overwatch (1 OP)
  • Close Assault (1 OP plus the cost of movement)
  • Over Run Attack (2 OP plus the cost of movement)
  • Rally 1 (1 OP)
  • Fire IDF (2 OP)
  • Call for Fire / Call for Aircraft (1 OP)
  • Engineering (2 OP)
  • Activate a Headquarters (2 OP) this is a cool rule whereby you activate a HQs unit or some kind of Command & Control node and it can then activate units within its radius for free.

The Passage of Time

I always loved Norm's use of the turn clock in his excellent "Into Battle" / (formerly Tigers at Minsk).  While I dont want to use that per se, I thought it would be a neat feature for players to tally up their used OPs during the turn.  Every 5 OPs used results in a 1D6 die roll towards the time clock.  This would matter for the game ending or for reinforcements arriving.  The defensive player could also be conservative with his OPs and slow down the clock if he knew there were allied reinforcements en route.

So What's Next?

All of these are my brainstorming and spit-balling ideas but so far I'm getting pretty excited.  Coupled with my proposed engagement system, I think these could be a really great way to spend a Saturday afternoon and even get "all the toys on the table" for a really huge battle.  My next step is to put together some kind of a quick reference sheet that will hold all of these ideas in a single space so I can playtest it (and document if of course).  I feel like there are some hidden trouble spots within this proposal, but overall I'm excited to try it out as I also feel it has much potential to bring back those nostalgic feelings for the original Panzerblitz, but with a bit more sophistication added.  Stay tuned!


4 comments:

  1. That all sounds good Steve. There used to be a lot of discussion ‘in the day’ about what became know as Panzer Bush (there is some discussion here - https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2643821/panzer-bush-panzer-blitz)

    I like the idea of op points (and of course the clock :-) ). It does allow the player to give some command priority to the part of the battle / battlefield that is grabbing their immediate attention.

    I play Old School Tactical and that uses defined Actions and Impulse Points. At the start of the turn you roll for Impulse Points (the scenario might give your force say 2D6+2 and the other side say 3D6+1) then during the turn, you alternate, taking it in turns to spend 1 impulse point to do something. Each time you can do 1 Action, but there are some things a unit can do only once in the turn, such as movement, but it might fire twice (or move once and then fire once or vice versa, but pay a shooting penalty for moving) and can attempt to rally as many times as it wishes over the turn, but everything always costs 1 action point. It is very inter-active.

    In your system, could you carry some OP’s over into the next turn?

    Could a player spend some OP’s to try and adjust the initiative dice at the start of the turn?

    I know you have ‘O’ Group, would the way that Headquarters hold additional dice that you can draw from (Action Points) in your case, be of any use?

    These are just thoughts and probably best ignored, should it derail what is pretty muc a clear vision that you have.

    Anyway, it all sounds very interesting and dynamic, look forward to whatever comes out of this …. And very good that you are back in the groove of being excited about a project.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Greetings Norm and Merry Christmas!
      Wow so much to comment on here. First if all, wanted you to know I played GMTs "combat commander" today and that was an excellent game. It was a loopy, asymmetric Squad Leader with cards.
      I actually tried purchasing a boxed set of Old School Tactical and wow it was expensive, but I love the concepts ,simplicity and of course the artwork. TBH I had not thought about moving OPs over from turn to turn (I like the idea of "banking" some - it shows there is staff work going on) and I absolutely love the idea of trying to use OPs to wrestle the initiative away from the opponent. I think the sky is the limit with this idea so nothing is off the table yet until I get some practice games in!

      I will certainly keep you posted, Norm!

      Delete
  2. Some excellent mechanisms at work here, and I love it, as (at least in my head) it echoes the thoughts we all have re. 'command friction', certainly in terms of the ops points/costs and then reconciling them vs 'time' on the battlefield. All looks very seamless too.
    Excellent analysis of all of this and it brought both some of the aspects of 'Hammer of Democracy' (though more simplistic there) and 'Altar of Freedom' (with the ACW turn clock being used in the defender's favour at times) to mind.
    this is awesome development work Steve.
    I was also thinking how this could be used on a more grand tactical scale for the Cold War battles around Fulda Gap ...am I getting ahead of myself lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cheers Darren I knew you'd appreciate this post, also. I think once I put it all together it's going to be a cracking game. Just need to put it through it's paces.

      Yep I'm already eyeing up a Fulda/ V Corps campaign and Jack is giving me hell every chance he can get about the Lariat Advance firestorm. We need to get that moving and perhaps these rules are just the ticket!

      Delete