If you're just tuning in, check out the previous post where I played the "Take the High Ground" scenario from the One Hour Wargames book using the "Black Powder" rules. Continuing on, I'm playing the same scenario although with "Rank and File" a game I haven't played in quite a long time, but enjoyed immensely when I did play it!
Will the expectations of my distant memory live up to the realities of a time strapped gamer 6 years later? Read on!
Same old story. Prussian Infantry Brigade moving forward to capture the hill I expanded the sizes to 6 stand Infantry Regiments. |
Atop the hill sit an Austrian infantry Regiment and a battery of medium guns. Behind them, at a greater distance, are 2 additional infantry regiments and 2 light skirmisher battalions.
"Rank & File" are very much a tournament style wargame with an interesting sequence of play. There are no fancy command and control gimmicks. You can pretty much maneuver as you wish, until you start taking significant casualties.
Note my snazzy casualty marker! Denotes a morale level reduction to "unsteady" the next grade is rout! They better rally! |
Lights move their full movement even in woods. |
Other light battalion reaches the hilltop. |
Austrian Brigade advances. |
Situation at turn 4. Note the cavalry in the center are ready to charge the guns! |
The guns are left behind and the rules say they can be re-crewed. The crew evade 2D6 distance which they did. The rules covering this are in a few different sections.
The single base with the red die are the gun crews. The Dragoons are spoiling for another charge! It's turn 5 now. |
Retreating is also something I needed to research. I think I had evade down, but what about retreat after melee? The rules are written very well, with all situations covered, but there is alot to remember.
These fellows will rout. But where? How? |
CHARGE MEN! SIR! THE RULES SAY WE HAVE TO STOP AND WAIT FOR EVERYONE TO SHOOT AT US NOW! |
End of turn 5 before melee. Constant combat is whittling away the lead Prussian Regiment and teh Austrian Regiment facing them is in big trouble. |
The Austrian Regiment was pushed back but their lights are on the hill! Note the infantry brigade sneaking up from the northeast. |
The situation at turn 7. The Austrian lights are about to boil out of the woods while their fresh, 6 stand infantry get into position to do some real damage. |
Prussians on the hill moving up. |
Austrian lights trade fire with the guns, who are now on the hill too. |
Lights coming out of the hill to skirmish with the guns and harass them. Meanwhile an Austrian Regiment marches forward as if the battery isn't even there. |
The commander of Wolfenbuttel spies a wall of white advancing. |
My favorite! Charging up the slope through shot and shell! |
Prussian valor couldn't stand against repeated Austrian assaults. |
The Final Verdict?
Nothing like I remembered it to be. There were so many rules I played incorrectly and had to research that it took the fun out of the game this time around. There are numerous things I liked, and numerous things i disliked. Here goes:
What I like about RANK AND FILE:
The infantry combat (both shooting and melee) is excellent. I love the attritional based nature of the firing, tied to the morale system. It's just like Neil Thomas' intro to wargaming and napoleonic wargaming rules, but more sophisticated. If your game was nothing but infantry regiments with no artillery or cavalry or skirmishers, you'd have a pretty excellent game.
I liked the simple sequence of play and the way movement and firing are handled. I also appreciate the initiative rolling each turn. It allows for a subtle change of the nature of the game and adds a little bit of tension.
I like the generous movement and firing and I appreciate the simplicity of the movement. Units can do alot of things and players will still come to grips relatively quickly.
I like that there is a breakpoint to the armies and that the games don't end with literally 2 units chasing each other around the table, which at least from my reading and understanding of war, is not how battles end.
What I dislike about RANK AND FILE:
The charge/melee portion and where it lies within the turn sequence. In the game, making the decision to charge is an important one and you must declare it in the beginning. Having units stop 2" short, then allowing everyone to shoot at them is a neat concept and makes sense to me, but where it all happens throughout the turn is a little confusing.
What happens after melee and charges requires some pre-reading and understanding.
The "half stand" skirmisher concept, and "single stand" artillery concept was tough to wrap my head around. The rules discuss artillery batteries with single stands, and skirmisher unit "half stands" however liberally sprinkled throughout the rules are references to how artillery will fight with which bases, etc in melees. While I understand the idea or concept, in reality this doesn't play as clean as it reads. I found that alot with these rules, which again, I really enjoyed but had a hard time coming back to without reading much more carefully.
So there you have it! It was fun returning to these rules to see how my thoughts have evolved over the last 6 years. I really enjoyed these rules, but they certainly warrant careful re-reading before play. For the price tag, however, they are definitely comparable and could give just as good of a game as higher priced rules out there.
I am loving the pocket armies concept. 2 small Seven Years War games have been played with very different rules. Both Austrian victories but they played out somewhat differently. My next, and last, game in this great experiment is to play this same battle with "Honours of War" and see how that plays out.
For this battle, I would sure like to know how the dragoons managed to get onto the guns' flank without any response from the guns. This was a much different battle than the first even though the result was the same. I am really looking forward to see what you think of HoW.
ReplyDeleteJonathan,
DeleteThe artillery can only pivot 45 degrees. I was busy shooting at the infantry to their front.
I just played through 8 turns of Honours of War. I liked it and it plays very fast. Im not sure i played everything correctly but the game was fun. Ill reserve my comments so as to keep you in suspense!
You are a tease!
DeleteExcellent review of the rules. I must give these another view, and I can see some of the frustrations.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to the next pocket battle.
Cheers, Darren. I think these rules would give a very exciting and fun game. I feel like their strength might lie in a bigger game with lots of units.
DeleteSteve, have really enjoyed both accounts and the comparison. Your very honest narrative about fighting with the rules today will be instantly recognisable to many gamers who know ‘that’ feeling only too well (insert your troublesome rule set here!).
ReplyDeleteAlso enjoyed your like / dislike list.
Though a self contained action, an assault on a hill, with a defender reserve racing forward brings a lot of scope for rule comparison. Really looking forward to the third game. Thanks for all the work that is going into doing these comparisons.
Thanks, Norm. This has been alot of fun comparing various rules and the elements of those rules that i like.
DeleteNorm mentioned 'troublesome set' of rules ...my addled brain immediately pattern matched the words 'Slack Chowder' ARGHHH.
Delete;)
May have missed it, but given the attrition mechanism, is there any provision for line relief?
ReplyDeleteNot that im aware of. Once units hit 50%, they are pretty much useless. I think he wants you to keep a reserve and manage your units in the line.
Delete